This is mostly a library for myself. Here, I drop stories for future reference. Topics include but are not limited to:
Political Theory, Libertarianism, War, Constitution, Central Banking, Middle East, Cultural Marxism, Oppression, Lies, Justice
I entertain conspiracy theories, and yes, I’ve gone down some rabbit holes during my journey. Some profoundly shifted my sense of the world, others were nonsense. I have not gone back and vetted these stories for accuracy.
(more about me)
Before he achieved political office, Bernie Sanders never had a steady paycheck in the first four decades of his life. . . . Sanders spent most of his life as an angry radical and agitator who never accomplished much of anything.
Sanders failed to earn a living, even as an adult. It took him 40 years to collect his first steady paycheck — and it was a government check. One of his first jobs was registering people for food stamps, and it was all downhill from there.
. . . he tried his hand freelancing for leftist rags, writing about “masturbation and rape” and other crudities for $50 a story.
Friends said he was “always poor” and his “electricity was turned off a lot.” They described him as a slob who kept a messy apartment — and this is what his friends had to say about him.
The only thing he was good at was talking … non-stop … about socialism and how the rich were ripping everybody off.
Good news! A doubled police presence resulted in only 22 sex attacks at German carnival in Cologne.
Social justice is a cult of weakness, of duplicity, of envy, of bitterness, of helplessness, of ugliness, of failure.
For my part, I would rather uphold the standards of truth, beauty, strength, honor, aspiration, victory and success.
There’s no honor in suppressing and tyrannizing the weak and the defective.
But there is still less in allowing them to accomplish the total inversion of values, the total inversion of virtues.
These assholes have to be ripped out, root and branch.
A mob of black-clad masked men went on a rampage in and around Stockholm’s main train station last night beating up refugees and anyone who did not look like they were ethnically Swedish.
Before the attack, the group of 200 people handed out xenophobic leaflets with the message ‘Enough now’.
Swedish media reported that the thugs, allegedly linked to Sweden’s football hooligan scene, were targeting unaccompanied minors with a ‘foreign’ background.
Swedish police warns that Stockholm’s main train station has become unsafe after being ‘taken over’ by dozens of Moroccan street children.
The all-male migrant teen gangs are spreading terror in the centre of the Swedish capital, stealing, groping girls and assaulting security guards, according to Stockholm police.
Members of the gangs, some as young as nine, roam central Stockholm day and night, refusing help provided by the Swedish authorities.
As part of their press to have their wild claims of man-caused global warming accepted as factual science, the scheming alarmists often cited a statistic that 97% of the world’s top climate scientists support their fairy tale. Now a group of elite scientists and others are on the record disputing those claims, and in numbers that would also challenge those who throw out that 97% consensus figure.
With the alarmists allowing for only three percent of the scientific community to be in opposition to their claims, the three hundred would conversely commit the global warming crowd to a minimum of 9,700 accredited experts in support of their claims, if every scientist in opposition signed the letter. Are they prepared with names and endorsements to substantiate those assertions?
The three hundred scientist signatories included 25 climate or atmospheric scientists, 23 geologists, 18 meteorologists, 51 engineers, 74 physicists, 20 chemists and 12 economists. One is a Nobel Prize winning physicist and two are astronauts. These experts sent a letter to Texas Republican Congressman Lamar Smith on Thursday, and to his House Committee on Science, Space and Technology. In it they warned that NOAA may have violated federal law when they rewrote history and climate science by altering global temperature data.
They did so in what appears to have been a deliberate effort to eliminate the actual information which showed there had been no warming at all for a minimum of fifteen years. The facts were proving to be problematic for the Obama regime and the UN in advance of the UN COP21 climate summit in Paris. Not only did they eliminate the troublesome pause, they doubled down, providing the basis for the globalist arguments that the first fifteen years of the 21st century were the warmest on record.