This is nothing new, of course.
– (2008) Censoring Ron Paul – Why the rEVOLution will not be televised
– (2009) Censoring Ron Paul (then and now)
Notice anyone missing? This is an unconfirmed picture that a Ron Paul supporter took of his television showing Fox News election coverage in New Hampshire.
FANTASTIC COMPARISON of media comments about Iowa Caucus in 2008 vs 2012
– They name the candidates at the start of the coverage, ignoring Ron Paul.
– “The guy to stop is Mitt Romney.”
– When the show the polls with Paul leading: “The leader is now Ron Paul, now he’s not much of a threat to Mitt Romney because he doesn’t have a chance to win the nomination.”
– Long discussion of Romney vs. Gingrich and Perry.
– “If Ron Paul wins, who stands, I mean, who loses, who does he take votes away from the most do you think?”
– Long explanation of why Romney is most likely to win in Iowa.
– “If Ron Paul wins Iowa, what does it mean for New Hampshire and South Carolina down the line?” “I think it all depends on who’s second and third.” Discussion of Gingrich vs. Romney. “Ron Paul is no threat to win the nomination. . . . He’s not going to break out of the libertarian box.”
– “Romney or Gingrich, who has the better chance beyond Iowa?”
– “Is he [Ron Paul] going to be Ross Perot of this race? Is he going to be the spoiler for the Republican Party?”
– “Ron Paul is going to be a long term irritant. He’s not going to be a significant threat.”
– “Ron Paul is an unthinkable Republican nominee. He’s the ideal Democratic version of the nominee.”
– If Ron Paul goes through the election winning 15-20% of the vote, “he would stand at the end of it the leader of a sizable faction of the Republican party that supports views that are antithetical the views of the mainstream of the Republican party.”
– Discusses 20 year old newsletters.
– “He’s not only unacceptable in the Republican party . . . He’s unacceptable in America because of what he’s written.”
– Discussion of how Iowa’s importance will suffer if Ron Paul wins.
Gingrich: I wouldn’t vote for Ron Paul
He called the candidate’s views “totally outside the mainstream of virtually every decent American” and that the congressman couldn’t win because “people won’t take him as a serious person.” He added that he personally wouldn’t vote for Paul, saying, “I think the choice of Ron Paul or Barack Obama would be a very bad choice for America.
Headline: ‘Ron Paul wishes Israel didn’t exist’
Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul negates Israel’s right to exist, Eric Dondero, who served as a senior aide to the 76-year-old Texas congressman for over 12 years, said on Monday.
Includes clips of Gingrich.
Dick Morris, reacting to the fact that military personnel overwhelmingly support Ron Paul: “No true patriot could be for Ron Paul.” (more)
“So I come back from my weekend and I see this thread and I’m just plain disgusted by all of this circlejerk, fanatical, conspiratard, inter-party warfare bullshit.
You guys have zero respect for the rest of your “people.” This whole ‘if you aren’t voting RP, you’re a neo-con’ talking point is pitifully weak and over used. It wouldn’t be problem if it were here and there, but it’s damn near every thread that has some Paul cocksuckery going on. Anyone how objects gets slammed with little to no room for discussion.
So for at least until I’m bored with it, I’m going to be removing any new Paul-specific threads. You don’t like it, go to one of the many sub-reddits that are dedicated to his worship. Conservatism doesn’t revolve around Paul’s ideology, and for the people who thinks it does, I truly pity you. You should know, it’s a lot broader than that excessively narrow and hostile perspective.
Feel free to make up whatever conspiracy theories about me being paid for by the establishment, or call me a neo-con. It’s not going to hurt my feelings, nor is it going to change anything.”
Daily News: Ron Paul in racist newsletter flap
A blast from the past is blowing a big hole in Ron Paul’s campaign.
A recently surfaced video from 1995 shows the GOP presidential hopeful discussing controversial newsletters that he claimed this week he didn’t even read until about 2001.
The Texas congressman has come under fire in recent days for the newsletters, called Ron Paul’s Political Report, Ron Paul’s Freedom Report and the Ron Paul Survival Report, which went out under his name in the late 1980s and early 1990s during his time in and out of office. (Read more)
Mitt Romney surges in N.H., but No. 2 Ron Paul gets no media loveNew polling data shows Mitt Romney cruising in New Hampshire, with nearly quadruple the support of Jon Huntsman, the GOP candidate in third place. Wait, why’d you skip to the third place guy? Who’s in second? Texas Congressman Ron Paul, of course.
Even though Huntsman and Paul both gained the same amount (six percentage points) since the last Suffolk University poll in June, and Paul has 14 percent support to Huntsman’s 10 percent, Decoder isn’t seeing any media love being thrown Paul’s way this morning.
This, despite the fact that the canned, ready-to-be-quoted bit from the Suffolk press release gives equal billing to Paul’s improvement alongside Huntsman’s.
About Ron Paul, Huckabee states today to Fox News’s Chris Wallace: “He has a core of fanatical believers, and they don’t represent mainstream Americans. It is not okay for Iran to have a nuclear weapon.”
Huckabee knows well that Dr. Paul has never said that he thinks it is perfectly OK for Iran to have a nuclear weapon. As a matter of fact, being a true man of peace, he has many times stated that he does not want anyone to have nuclear weapons.
Al Sharpton Goes After Ron Paul WERE TALKING ABOUT RACISM & SLAVERY!!
This MSNBC coverage also discusses his supposed walk off from a CNN interview, even though it had been found that the walk off never happened. It was made to appear that way by fraudulent editing by CNN.
– “Iowa has voted for exotic candidates before.”
– “Huckabee, same thing.”
– “They’re [the media] watching a Mitt Romney New Gingerich runoff.”
– “If Ron Paul wins Iowa, we just take it out.”
Can the MSM pull the plug on Ron Paul?
– Donald Trump tweet: A vote for Ron Paul is a totally wasted vote. If he wins Iowa — bad for Iowa’s credibility.
– Huckabee refers to “fanatical believers.”
TPM’s Josh Marshall: On Ron Paul “He’s The Candidate Who Thinks Gays Should Be Executed”
I just found a great website, RonPaulFlix.com paying special attention to bias Ron Paul coverage.
Addition: Occasionally I tune into NPR to hear the latest propaganda. I just listen to NPR’s All Things Considered describe Mitt Romney as the front runner in the race. (4:30pm Dec 20, 2011.) Ron Paul is leading in the polls! They then cut to Perry talking about how Obama should have bombed Iran, and the rise of Santorum. No mention of Paul whatsoever.
Addition: New York Times Column – Feel Free to Ignore Iowa