Enrich the troops; Ignore everyone else.
Posted in Dictatorship, Hidden History, Money/Economy/Taxes, War Without End on February 8th, 2012There was a fantastic mises daily article about creeping taxes and tyranny in the Roman Empire. Available in audio too. http://mises.org/daily/3663
Here are some excerpts:
- The advice that the Emperor Septimius Severus gave to his two sons, Caracalla and Geta: “live in harmony; enrich the troops; ignore everyone else.”
- “nobody should have any money but I, so that I may bestow it upon the soldiers.”
- “. . . he doubled the inheritance taxes paid by Roman citizens. When this was not sufficient to meet his needs, he admitted almost every inhabitant of the empire to Roman citizenship. What had formerly been a privilege now became simply a means of expanding the tax base.”
- “One of the Christian fathers, Saint Gregory Nazianzus, commented that war is the mother of taxes. I think that’s a wonderful thing to keep in mind: war is the mother of taxes. And it’s also, of course, the mother of inflation.”
- “the class known as the decurions. This was your prosperous, small- and middle-landowning class who were the dominant elements of the cities of the Roman Empire. They were the class from whom the municipal counsels, magistrates, and officials were chosen. . . . they had donated, not merely their time, but also their wealth to the betterment of the urban environment. Building stadiums and bathhouses, and repairing the streets and providing for pure water were considered benefactions. It was a kind of philanthropic act and their reward was, of course, public recognition and esteem. . . .The central government could no longer collect its taxes effectively, so they made the decurion class collectively responsible for getting revenues and passing them on to the imperial government. The decurions, of course, had as much difficulty as anyone else in doing this, and the returns were, again, frequently inadequate. So the government solved that problem by simply passing a law that any taxes that decurions could not collect from others, they would have to pay out of their own pockets.”
- “merchants and artisans were now compelled to make deliveries of goods. So that if you had a factory for making garments, you now had to deliver so many garments to the government requisitions. If you had ships, you had to carry government goods in your ships. In other words, what we have here is a kind of nationalization of private enterprises, and this nationalization means that the people who use their money and their talent are now compelled to serve the state whether they like it or not. When people tried to get out of this they were then, by law, compelled to remain in the occupation that they were in. In other words, you couldn’t change your job or your business. This was not sufficient because, after all, death is a relief from taxes. So the occupations were now made hereditary. When you died, your son had to take up your profession. If your father was a shoemaker, you had to be a shoemaker. These laws started by being restricted to the defense-oriented industries but, of course, gradually it was realized that everything is defense-oriented.”

F-35 Concurrency was “Acquisition Malpractice”: In retrospect, hurrying the F-35 strike fighter into production was, to say the least, a big mistake, according to the Pentagon’s acquisition executive nominee. “Putting the F-35 into production years before the first test flight was acquisition malpractice. It should not have been done. But we did it,” said Frank Kendall, acting acquisition czar, during a Center for Security and International Studies-sponsored address in Washington, D.C., on Monday. Kendall said the department made “optimistic predictions” when it started production that it had good-enough design tools and simulations and modeling such that it wouldn’t have to worry about discovering problems with the aircraft in testing. That “was wrong and now we’re paying the price,” he said. The F-35 program “is probably an extreme example” of transitioning from development to production too early, said Kendall. On the bright side, all three F-35 variants “are making progress,” he noted. “We’re committed to that program. It is the future of tactical air for the Department of Defense.” Further, “we don’t, at this point, see anything that would preclude continuing production at a reasonable rate,” he said. (CSIS’ transcript of event) [emphasis added] 
